Climate science is rife with statistical manipulation, data tampering and other integrity issues — and that’s before politics get involved.
While climate change alarmists claim that the science on global warming is “settled,” the fact of the matter is that this so-called consensus has been based entirely on fraudulent data and bogus prediction “models.” And that fact should render any “settled” opinions on the matter completely null and void.
The climate change debate is far from over, as climate alarmists are now doubling down on their rhetoric and taking extreme measures to ensure that their narrative reigns supreme. Mass censorship of climate change skepticism is coming down the pike, as is the the systemic suppression of any voice which questions the predetermined lie. Meanwhile, the propaganda machine is running at top-speed, pushing out all kinds of leftist tripe about how the world will end in 10 years if we don’t adopt socialist pipe dream policies, like the Green New Deal.
There is no shortage of experts who are critical of current climate change hypotheses, and there are many criticisms to be had. Marc Morano, an expert in climate skepticism from Climate Depot, has repeatedly gone on the record to debate climate change dogma and illustrate the inanity of so-called climate “science.” In a recent interview with Fox and Friends, Morano ruffled feathers by explaining the scientific reality that carbon dioxide is not, in fact, pollution.
An increasing number of scientists are daring to speak out about this biological reality.
NASA astronaut and geologist Harrison H. Schmitt is quoted as saying, “Thanks to the single-minded demonization of this natural and essential atmospheric gas by advocates of government control of energy production, the conventional wisdom about carbon dioxide is that it is a dangerous pollutant. That’s simply not the case.”
MIT climate scientist Richard Lindzen has also expressed the opinion that CO2 isn’t a threat.
“CO2 , it should be noted, is hardly poisonous. On the contrary, it is essential for life on our planet and levels as high as 5000 ppm are considered safe on our submarines and on the space station (current atmospheric levels are around 400 ppm, while, due to our breathing, indoor levels can be much higher),” Lindzen reportedly said in 2017.
Mike Adams, founder of Natural News and Brighteon.com, has repeatedly written about the benefits increased CO2 levels have had on the planet, noting that it is essential for plant life to flourish...read more>>>...
