To enable the “adoption” of the Pandemic Treaty next week, WHO is making up the rules as it goes along

 WHO is now saying that if countries agree to “adopt” the Pandemic Agreement at the WHA, the Agreement will be deposited with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus for countries to sign. But, the signing of the Agreement will not be possible any time soon.

If it is “adopted,” countries need to notify Tedros on whether they intend to accept the Pandemic Agreement within 18 months of the WHA.  However, member states can only sign the Pandemic Agreement after an annexe for the much-contested PABS System has been adopted by a future WHA.

From the moment a member state signs the Pandemic Agreement, it will be expected not to undermine it.  Does this mean that they cannot speak against it or criticise it?  Is WHO using a top-down approach to censor governments, officials and advisors?  Is WHO also expecting governments that sign its agreement to ensure that their citizens do not undermine the Pandemic Agreement as well?  Censorship is the first sign that something bad is afoot.

After signing the Pandemic Agreement, the member states then need to take the appropriate action within their countries to ratify or adopt the agreement so it takes effect.  In the UK, for example, the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act [1984] grants the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, currently Wes Streeting, the power to adopt or give effect to such an agreement without reference to anyone else. To stop WHO’s nefarious pandemic agenda from being implemented in the UK, the section of the Act granting Streeting this power, section 45, needs to be repealed....<<<Read More>>>...