The proposals could also backfire by inflaming tensions among other minority faith groups who might perceive it as favouring Muslims, says the analysis by the respected Counter Extremism Group (CEG), a research centre.
The report, by Dr Daniel Allington of King’s College, which was backed by a panel of experts including legislators and police, comes ahead of the publication of Labour’s official definition of anti-Muslim hostility.
Steve Reed, the Communities Secretary, is finalising the new definition based on a draft from an advisory group, headed by Dominic Grieve, the former Tory attorney general, which was submitted to the Government in October.
The non-statutory definition is aimed at providing guidance for behaviour codes that public bodies, councils and businesses could adopt to combat prejudice, discrimination and hostility towards Muslims.
The group’s definition has avoided the word “Islamophobia” and instead called it “anti-Muslim hostility” so that it focuses on hate towards Muslims rather than Islam. It follows concerns over its potential impact on free speech and fears of a back-door blasphemy law.
However, the CEG report claimed that any definition was unnecessary because existing UK equality, hate and human rights laws already provided adequate protection for members of all faith groups, including Muslims. …
It added that existing laws also safeguarded free speech because, while protecting the right to practise and promote a religion, they also underpinned the right to criticise religions and their associated practices...<<<Read More>>>...
