Clive Pinder’s essay in the Daily Sceptic last weekend on English independence is sharply argued and often very funny. Suppose he’s right.
Suppose
the United Kingdom really has become, as he characterised it, “an
exhausted multinational holding company held together by inertia,
nostalgia, transfer payments and the BBC weather map”. Suppose Scotland
really does vote like a Nordic social democracy, Wales like its run by
public-sector socialists and Northern Ireland like a theological
argument attached to a motorway network. Suppose England really does
carry most of the economic weight, only to be lectured by its own
governing class for the impertinence of noticing.
Suppose the
diagnosis is exactly right: Pinder has pinpointed the rot accurately. He
has then drawn precisely the wrong conclusion from it.
The first thing he gets wrong is the confusion of the British state with the British settlement.
The
state is the political class, the supranational creep, the regulatory
accretion, the judicial activism, the BBC, the Civil Service that signed
off tens of billions of pandemic-era fraud and waste without anyone in
particular being held to account. The settlement is the 1707 Acts of
Union, the shared Crown, the common law, the Parliament, the British
identity built across three centuries on top of those. The state has
spent the past three decades betraying the settlement. The settlement
has held up rather better than the state has — through industrial
revolutions, two World Wars, the loss of empire, devolution and Brexit.
Its institutions still work. Dissolving the settlement to fix the state
is amputation on the theory that a missing leg is less trouble than a
sore knee....<<<Read More>>>...
