A well-heeled homeowner, who no longer has to work, has spent £900,000 converting his home so that it could achieve an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) with an ‘A’ rating. This effectively means it generates more energy than it uses. The Telegraph has the story.
On
the day Simon Buck exchanged on his home in New Malden, south-west
London, he stood across the road with a notepad and started to draw.
“I
literally sketched the design of a new house that was in my head,” he
says. “Then I spent the next two years going about researching and
working out how I was going to do it.”
He had a clear goal: to upgrade the property into the ultimate eco-home that could generate more energy than it consumed.
This
would be no easy feat. The house – which was built in the early 1950s –
had an energy performance certificate (EPC) rating of ‘E’, placing it
within the bottom 14% of English homes for energy efficiency.
EPCs
aim to measure the energy efficiency of a property and are calculated
based on the amount of energy used per square metre. Not only are more
energy-efficient properties cheaper to run, they can also command higher
house prices and may be eligible for ‘green mortgages’, which can come
with preferential rates.
For Buck, it took almost two years from
buying the home for a “bargain” £1 million in July 2023 before work on
the project could begin.
“We ended up blowing the budget
massively in pursuit of the best possible score,” says Buck, who spent
£900,000 on the renovation. “There’s £100,000 worth of tech sitting in
the plant room. I went over the top with everything.
“I could’ve built the house for a third of the price but it wouldn’t be the house that we have.”
Included
in the exorbitant price were the solar panels, which – alongside a
20-kilowatt battery to store some of the electricity they produce – cost
around £15,000.
Buck also installed a £30,000 state-of-the-art heat pump.
His
home remains at a steady temperature throughout the year, with the
thermostat hovering at a pleasant 23 degrees Celsius. The 46 year-old
says he is able to walk around the house in the winter wearing only
shorts and a T-shirt.
Obviously, that was well worth the
£900,000 price tag. Buck is 46. Assuming he lives at least another 40
years that works out at £22,500 per annum to be able to wear shorts
indoors in the winter. That’s roughly 10 times or more than the average household energy costs in the UK according to British Gas.
Unfortunately
for the Government and its plans, Buck’s project only serves to
demonstrate that the Net Zero dream is just that, way beyond the means
of both most of the population and the public purse, especially given
the age of most of Britain’s housing stock. As for Buck, he plans to
sell up and start on a new-build project to create an even more
efficient home. Whatever lights his fire, so to speak....<<<Read More>>>....
Welcome to "A Light In The Darkness" - a realm that explores the mysterious and the occult; the paranormal and the supernatural; the unexplained and the controversial; and, not forgetting, of course, the conspiracy theories; including Artificial Intelligence; Chemtrails and Geo-engineering; 5G and EMR Hazards; The Net Zero lie ; Trans-Humanism; The Depopulation Agenda; The Covid-19 and mRNA vaccine issues; Flat Earth; Tartaria; The Online Safety Act ... and a whole lot more.
