When Labour swept to power in July 2024, the scale of the victory was intoxicating. Over 400 seats. A majority of 170. What was easy to miss in the euphoria was that Labour had achieved all of this on just 33.7% of the popular vote, with turnout barely scraping 60%. It was not a nation embracing Starmer. It was a nation exhausted by the alternative — and there is quite a difference between a country that wants you and one that has simply run out of worse options. Starmer never seemed to grasp this distinction, which may explain why he has spent the intervening period behaving as though he won a revolution rather than a weary national shrug.
A leader who understood the fragility of his position would have moved with urgency, clarity and purpose. Instead, Starmer has governed as he campaigned — cautiously, reactively and with a forensic attention to process that has proved entirely useless when what the moment required was instinct, conviction or the faintest flicker of inspiration....<<<Read More>>>...
