[Humans Are Free]: We are The People’s Brexit, a group of
Solicitors, legal researchers and campaigners.
We have been extensively
researching the current legal situation since the illegal ‘lockdown’
deprived us all of our Democracy, Human Rights and Freedoms.
We
have now established that The Coronavirus Act 2020 is null and void.
There are many reasons for this, the main one being that S1(1) of the
Act defines ‘coronavirus’ as being ‘covid-19’ or it’s other name ‘SARS
Cov-2’.
However,
by virtue of the fact that it is not legally, medically or
scientifically recognised as a disease or virus it cannot be legislated
against, and this makes the whole Act null and void.
The reason for this is that ‘covid-19’
has not been subjected to the 130 year established legal, medical and
scientific procedure that recognises if it is actually a disease or
virus or not, which is known as the Koch Postulates.
This involves purifying and isolating the ‘disease’ or ‘virus’ and
proving that it actually causes the illness that it is claimed that it
does.
The Government has acted Ultra
Vires and against the Rule of Law. Further, there are a multitude of
procedural and legal errors made when the Government enacted this
legislation. Including enforcing the Act on 23rd March with the
‘lockdown’ before it actually became law with Royal Assent on 25th March.
In
addition, the Act facilitates misreporting of deaths from various
illnesses that it is claimed are also suffering with ‘covid-19’ as
doctors are told to just use guesswork as to cause of death. This has
been happening since the 10th March, long before the Act became law and
allows the ‘covid-19’ statistics to increase rapidly.
There
is no doubt the figures are being manipulated and any excess mortality
is due to the terrible inhumane suffering, fear and neglect caused by
the ‘lockdown’ itself. With lifesaving treatment cancelled and people
too terrified to seek urgent medical help.
Also,
existing legislation should have been used for a Pandemic such as the
Infectious Diseases Act 1984 and if this was not sufficient the Civil
Contingencies Act 2004 should have been used. This would have protected
our Human Rights, as s20 of the Act demanded, along with other
requirements and protections under the Act including “due proportion”,
Parliamentary scrutiny and a duration of only 30 days maximum.
This is outlined in the Department of Health’s report ‘UK Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Strategy 2011’:....<<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
