We suspected 'dishonesty' so took the liberty of playing about with the image to arrive at this presentation.
On face value it appears like there are 'non-natural' formations and suspicious artifacts in the photograph.
Here is the dilemma. IF this image is really from Mars then NASA clearly know more about the true Mars than has ever been revealed publically. IF this image is a deliberate deception, and it is actually somewhere on EARTH, then NASA has been really very naughty masquerading this and other presentations as being Mars. What would be the reason for the misrepresentation? Either way it opens up a can of worms. Is NASA really a CGI/Photoshop workshop like so many claim???
