Nigel Farage would have been well suited to the job [of newspaper
editor], because he possesses an almost uncannily sharp news sense. That
is, he has a special knack for identifying issues that matter to
ordinary people yet have been missed or dismissed by those who grandly
assume they know better. Free movement, for example, or the small boats.
He was banging on about these problems long before most of his rivals
grasped the true scale of their salience. In short: like an experienced
editor, he always seems to know what the next big story is going to be.
All
of which is why I think it would be a grave mistake for his opponents
to ignore his latest comments about Net Zero. Speaking to the Sun on
Sunday, Mr Farage said: “This could be the next Brexit, where Parliament
is so hopelessly out of touch with the country.”
The Reform
leader’s foes seem convinced that, in fact, he’s the one who’s out of
touch. Look at the polls, they scoff. According to the Observer,
“Polling experts believe the attacks on Net Zero could backfire on
Reform”, because “the policy is overwhelmingly supported by the public”.
Hmm. I wouldn’t be so sure. Many people may indeed have told
pollsters that they support Net Zero. But are we quite certain that they
meant it?
Personally, I tend to feel that, if you really want
to know whether the public supports Net Zero, the question to ask is
not, “Do you support Net Zero?” Instead, the question to ask is: “To
help achieve Net Zero, what sacrifices would you personally be willing
to make? Would you be willing to give up flying? How much more would you
be willing to pay in green taxes? Exactly how much poorer are you
willing to be? And, given that Britain is responsible for less than 1%
of the planet’s annual greenhouse gas emissions, how much difference do
you think it would make to global temperatures even if this country
somehow achieved Net Zero tomorrow? Oh, and before you answer: did you
see the FT headline from February, which read: ‘China’s Construction of
Coal-Fired Power Plants Reaches Highest in a Decade’?”
Even
asking those questions, however, wouldn’t necessarily lead us to the
truth. Because public opinion isn’t always what it seems....<<<Read More>>>...
Welcome to "A Light In The Darkness" - a realm that explores the mysterious and the occult; the paranormal and the supernatural; the unexplained and the controversial; and, not forgetting, of course, the conspiracy theories; including Artificial Intelligence; Chemtrails and Geo-engineering; 5G and EMR Hazards; The Net Zero lie ; Trans-Humanism and Trans-Genderism; The Covid-19 and mRNA vaccine issues; The Ukraine Deception ... and a whole lot more.