"They held me for all that time, but they didn't even take a DNA sample from me," he told me, incredulously. "Can you believe that? I would happily have provided a swab."This guy is 'very suspicious' in my opinion. Using this photograph for psychometry, provides very odd and uncomfortable links indeed. Unsavoury and suspicious are the only words to describe the impressions I receive from it. Be interesting to discover who the male with black hair and the blonde woman are who he knows. Very suspicious circumstances surround this man ... is there something Law Enforcement or a Government Agency are not permitting to be revealed around this guy? He is certainly close to the McCanns; knows more about them than he lets on ... and has a very wide sphere of influence via the web network . His business dealings appear to be well hidden; the drag net which Law Enforcement are supposed to have used to investigate him barely scratch the surface. I feel I must call him 'the watcher' ...perhaps 'the juggler' because he is such a risk taker .....
Daily Mail headline, says:
In the eyes of many, Robert Murat has already been tried and found guilty of abducting Madeleine. But David Jones has had the first full interview with him - and comes to a very unsettling conclusion
Last Wednesday, while Gerry and Kate McCann were in Rome imploring the Pope to pray for the safe return of their four-year-old daughter, Madeleine, I spent a disquieting afternoon on the Algarve, drinking coffee with Robert Murat.
Eighteen days ago, this enigmatic, Portuguese-raised Englishman was arrested on suspicion of abducting Madeleine from a holiday apartment just 120 yards from the villa he shares with his widowed mother, Jenny.
Murat was released without charge after 19 hours of questioning. Yet today - a month after Madeleine's hauntingly pretty face first became etched in our collective nightmares - he remains the only formally identified police suspect.
Ordinarily, of course, an accused man retains his innocence until proven guilty. But this is no ordinary case. The McCanns' increasingly desperate publicity campaign (yesterday they were in Madrid) has made it the most high-profile child abduction in history.
t has also been suggested that he coldly volunteered to assist in the hunt for Madeleine to glean inside information, and remain one step ahead of the police investigation, just as Ian Huntley did after the Soham murders.
Weighed with various accrued morsels of suspicion against him - an unexplained 11.40pm phone call on the night of the abduction; a car hired hastily two days later - some close observers have concluded that Murat is, indeed, the monster who took Madeleine, and that it is only a matter of time before he is formally charged with her abduction.
Over the forthcoming days, they may yet be proved right, though given the performance of the Portuguese police, this seems unlikely. For the story Murat had to tell me raises profound and disturbing questions about the nature of the Madeleine investigation.
"They held me for all that time, but they didn't even take a DNA sample from me," he told me, incredulously. "Can you believe that? I would happily have provided a swab."
Assuming Murat is telling the truth, this is a jaw- dropping omission, and throws the entire forensic operation into question.
