Daily Express Front & Back Pages for Tuesday 4th September 2007There is so much on these pages with subliminal suggestions. Firstly there is the 'new attack on parents' main story linked with more paper selling scandal relating to the McCanns. Secondly, the images of tanks, the Britsh flag linked with 'on our way out'. Then check out the back page headlines and you get 'its make or break' .... all in all these headlines make for an interesting 'muse' if nothing else.Then there is this 'latest' slur story relating to the McCanns in the paper itself, 'New Slur Pile On Anguish For Waiting Parents', "THE anguished parents of missing Madeleine McCann faced a fresh onslaught of slurs yesterday. Friends believe Kate and Gerry McCann are the victims of a concerted sniping campaign to hound them out of Portugal. It is feared they are being targeted because their continued presence in the country highlights the failure of the police to capture their daughter’s abductor. A close friend said: “These slurs are part of a co-ordinated drive to force Kate and Gerry to leave and take the spotlight off the police investigation.” Yesterday the parents were accused of psychologically damaging their twins and receiving preferential treatment. As they marked the fourth month since their daughter’s disappearance, websites originally set up to support the family were carrying vile messages attacking the couple and accusing them of lapping up the limelight."
I'm not commenting here as either 'pro-McCann' or 'anti-McCann' ... but surely this aggressive smokescreen perpetrated by the busy bees of the Pied Piper has gone on long enough? The clouds still billow with a purpose. They still conceal the pathway from the general public, but surely this constant needle in the groove has lost its 'point' by now .... ??? I wonder what lies around the corner with regard the next phase of this stage play .... be further 'interesting' reading I am sure. In chaos we reside, lupendo keeps the knots kept tight, but once that which is being created looms before the observer's eyes .... might not the observer realise what it is that has been contrived?
