The classroom 'cancer risk' of wi-fi internet

Wi-Fi stands for Wireless Fidelity and is, a set of standards for transmitting data from computers etc over a network without wires.This transmission is fast enough to allow transfer at a broadband-like rate

Daily Mail headline says: "Britain's top health watchdog has called for an inquiry into the use of wireless Internet networks in schools because of concerns they could be exposing children to the risk of cancer. The demand came after it was revealed that classroom "wi-fi" networks give off three times as much radiation as a typical mobile phone mast. Guidelines from the Health Protection Agency already state that masts should not be sited near schools because of a possible cancer link and other health risks."

Is this perhaps another case of 'paranoia' or is there really something ominously dangerous with this latest form of technology?

Wi-fi Internet is a real potential health time-bomb in the making ... it is something which is of real concern to myself and countless others across this world; especially those of us aware of the deliberate understanding (and usage) of sound frequencies on the human consciousness. Wireless frequencies are just another in a long line of high frequency sound waves which are to be present in the airwaves which pass through our mind and bodies each and every day.

In addition to the already existing massive interference from unnatural electromagnetic fields from sources such as mobile phones, DECT (cordless) phones, microwave ovens and computer screens, children, adolescents and staff are now to be exposed to additional health hazards ....


'What is WIFI?' extract:

• Wi-Fi stands for Wireless Fidelity and is, a set of standards for transmitting data from computers etc over a network without wires.

• This transmission is fast enough to allow transfer at a broadband-like rate

'Is WIFI Bad For Your Health?' extract: "The fears about the technology are similar to those being expressed about mobile phones – although in radiation terms the amount received from a wireless network is a significant amount less than from a single mobile – simply because they are designed to operate over much smaller areas."

With a network within one room it is still mostly an individual decision whether the students are linked with each other via cable or wireless. If the network extends through the entire school, the staff has no possibility to decide whether they agree to be exposed to the additional radiation or not. Similar to the situation in the waiting areas in airports and large train stations, they are exposed all working day long to the electromagnetic fields from the WLAN transmitters. Exposures within a building can vary to a large degree. Overlaps and reflections can create radiation hotspots which go completely unnoticed.

There is unfortunately insufficient 'legitimate' evidence in the public arena to safely conclude the effects on WIFI frequencies on the human mind. However, if we were somehow able to obtain copies of Illuminati-funded laboratory tests on WIFI frequencies we would know the real answer ... I'm pretty certain that WIFI frequencies have silently been tested on the human population for decades ... and their effects known. For me WIFI is just another way for the modern day Enlilites to systematically lobotomise the 'primitive workers' ready for the mass decimations planned in the next 20 - 30 years; and I don't perceive I'm wrong about this!