data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24122/24122b52a53dbaacdf96b6eb8415e089af0bdf69" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d7e8/3d7e8a42251e6f10c2077b8228a18c583c40a93c" alt=""
A recent version of this same photograph on the left hand side ... and there is no distinctive 'teardrop' marking in her right eyes, as can be clearly seen in the zoomed image below. Why? What is going on here ... why has someone gone to the trouble of 'removing' the eye marking from this photograph of Madeleine? This is clearly a deliberate act? There is nothing misunderstood in this observation (Many thanks to 'J' for passing this info on to me by the way). I am concerned by the obvious implications of this 'discovery'. The intention of removing the distinctive marking from
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63da0/63da0e113834dd3bbe7ebd95ef5203b1fbb6f32a" alt=""
Source of 'eye without teardrop': The Daily Mail 6/8/07