... the photograph of Maddy on the right hand side there is no mistaking her distinctive 'teardrop' marking .... yet ...A recent version of this same photograph on the left hand side ... and there is no distinctive 'teardrop' marking in her right eyes, as can be clearly seen in the zoomed image below. Why? What is going on here ... why has someone gone to the trouble of 'removing' the eye marking from this photograph of Madeleine? This is clearly a deliberate act? There is nothing misunderstood in this observation (Many thanks to 'J' for passing this info on to me by the way). I am concerned by the obvious implications of this 'discovery'. The intention of removing the distinctive marking from
a photo of Maddy to use in an official campaign is deliberate and unnerving is it not? (The other option of the marking not being there in the first place is not something to even consider surely?) This is another level to this bewitching mystery for sure. It certainly proves all is not what it seems ... that deception is afoot. It fortifies my conviction that a rapture or an illusion has been created before our eyes .... I am even more wary now of the cunning Fox's dance which is there in blatant view; another slip up or another deliberate blatant act of triumphant arrogance? Decide for yourself (be objective not reactive) ...it is a puzzle for sure.Source of 'eye without teardrop': The Daily Mail 6/8/07
